Sunday, October 28, 2007

Period For Intercourse

Replica Committee

Replica Committee No Sludge interview the Mayor

The city wants the referendum. ... And the truth


If there is a new agreement on Bagnoli make it public, otherwise you do not make unnecessary claims. The interview given by the mayor to Anselmi Corriere Etrusco "made clear that without the much-vaunted" new deal "exists only in its intentions in the ads. One thing is certain: the old design, the one that currently exists, does not go over well either of them. Mayor and majority, who have staunchly defended him for months and heralded as a momentous occasion for the city of Piombino, now to say that that agreement Tugging no longer exists and that it will change radically.

But without popular mobilization, Anselmi had signed back in July a hoax of historic proportions: arrival of hazardous waste, lack of resources to cover operating costs, no relation to the reclamation of the SIN of Piombino a door made of waste tanks and docks, no serious consultation. And now you want even accredited as having averted the danger, improving the agreement that he stood until a few days ago. The Mayor admits that "it was urged by Rome and not requested by us, so if the government falls or" if one day get a statement from Rome says that the transaction will not be done more ... "It even seems to hope that an external circumstance or accidental levi's chestnuts from the fire.

would be better that our directors will assume their responsibilities and admit publicly that he did flop. Instead they seem to offer the city a new bluff. Or have to defend it wrong before and wrong now to change it. That's not how it strengthens the credibility of the institutions. You can not govern by trial or going blind, and especially can not tell lies. The same interview contains different: you want some documented example regarding the merits of the project?

1) the mayor said that before the materials were to be treated not to go in the tank but for the road foundations: false, because the point b art. 7 of the program expects to receive 600,000 cubic meters for the tanks., Of which 400,000 and 200,000 eligible to waste directly after treatment. Program is written in the Agreement on 31 July.

2) states that the mayor Nerli, president of the PA in Naples, had stated that the transfer in an anticipation of Piombino tanks consistently time the dismantling of Colma. False too, here's the official statement made to the Committee Nerli Surveillance few days ago: "if the agreement is signed by October, you save five months ..." 44 million more for public money in less than five months (reported by "The Chronicles of Naples on 19 October 2007). But the agreement not be signed by October, then the gap will shrink again.

also regret to note that the mayor continues to insult the committee (and especially the thousands of citizens who have followed him) reduces civic engagement in "political operation", which indicates once again lack of democratic character and plot suffer from the syndrome . The committee is not a small group of people, but a popular movement that has lasted three months, how long you could not see in this city. On behalf of the many active citizens concerned about the environmental situation of Piombino, we consider a priority and no more ads sull'inesistente referendum, and if there is ever a new agreement, it must be made known to the council and the citizens so that begins a new and true path of democratic participation. Finally

three other things, always on the merits.

The mayor, who has always shown a safe filled with the composition of Bagnoli, admits so perplexing that I know nothing about the content of the landfill Lucchini Piombino, in his hometown.

says that it all boils down to "dock", but this should do not worry just the same Port Authority, as an effluent as it is filled with sediment and Bagnoli pose serious risks for the chance to convert the tanks into the docks, is for different qualities (should not be polluted) and static. E 'already happened in Livorno that after filling the tanks with waste, they were not eligible to use port .

finally informs us that the road will be 398 with CIC produced by TAP, which if all goes well will start work in 2009. Not to mention that the design of the 398 there is still (and this too is expected to be ten years!) And is the essential condition for funding: But how long in this way to implement the project? Even the 398 seems to recede to the port. Would not it be better to work hard at his plan and reclamation, rather than smashing affair behind the incomprehensible Bagnoli?

The Committee No Mud

Friday, October 26, 2007

Making A Water Jet Toy

Conference legambiente

LEGAMBIENTE

National Directorate
Tuscan Regional Committee
Circle-Val di Cornia Piombino

IL PROBLEM OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE

from Piombino to BAGNOLI

Piombino, Ward "Gateway to the ground Desco" (old city)
Via Cellini 9
Monday, October 29, 2007
15.30

Introduces

Adriano Bruschi, President Legambiente Piombino

spoke

Ciafani Stefano, National Scientific Legambiente David Pellegrini, Researcher ICRAM

followed by a debate

Conclusions

Lucia Venturi, Legambiente national secretariat

are invited:

The Mayor of Piombino

the deputy in charge of the Province of Livorno the deputy in charge of the Tuscany Region The Committee NO MUD

The Port Authority of Piombino

The institutional representatives of neighboring municipalities representations of companies

trade unions and other organizations

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Finding Product Number

Commission referendum

SKIP THE COMMISSION TO DECIDE ON THE REFERENDUM!

Another postponement in the matter of waste Bagnoli. This time the stop is bureaucratic and concerns the technical committee responsible for evaluating the request for a referendum by the Committee No mud. The representative appointed by the Committee Paul Benesperi has indeed found an error in the resolution stated that the committee meeting, he spoke of the referendum on the program City - Region - ministries, while the referendum for which the Committee has collected the signatures and forward the request on ' agreement, but the arrival of the sludge. Benesperi raised the issue of procedure and the Commission found that it was necessary to redo the resolution establishing the committee, announcing the meeting.

"You have to start all over again - Paul explains Benesperi The truth is that now the council has to make a new resolution to appoint a new commission. Virtually everything has been cleared for the mistakes he made the city council. "

'It was an interim meeting - said another expert, the lawyer Renzo Grassi, who was appointed by the city - we upgraded soon, because by 31 the commission must give its opinion, let us remember that is technical and not political, the eligibility or otherwise of the referendum. "



Monday, October 22, 2007

How Much Sugar In A Package Of Vanilla Sugar

FangopoliTre




Herpes On Labia That Doesnt Go Away

FangopoliTre 3 2 1




Price Of An Radio Control Helicopter In Mumbai

FangopoliTre





Wednesday, October 17, 2007

What Is Discharge Mean When Period Hasnt Started

I drink water Pejo

Tirreno From this morning (yesterday) - "Here's the new agreement: development of the port and land reclamation for the city of Piombino is the title of the meeting with the commissioner Bramerini scheduled for tonight at 21 at the Hall of Perticale - .

I went there, and the Bramerini was accompanied by the usual handful of technicians of the region and together there was a future ex-mayor Gianni Anselmi with the usual crowd of politicians and local fixers.

The Bramerini not open his mouth and there was no document that illustrates this hypothetical new agreement, the presentation of the "new deal" was made so that by Anselmi, distancing himself by stating that not that he wants at all costs, presented what it considers the main changes: The sludge Bagnoli will not be processed or stored in Piombino, well, someone will say, then remain in Bagnoli! no ... no ... no ... it's all very simple: you bring in Piombino and bring you directly in the tanks without any treatment ... What!? Before you had to at least wash them and now are fine as they are? Certainly! He says the law ... and if he says the law is good then .?.?.?.!

I do not drink the tap water, some are controlled every day, is certainly consistent with the values \u200b\u200bof law ... Law? What law?? and if the law changes, the first one that was bad becomes good? and why it's called "water of the mayor? ... Want to see that the law makes it. ... Who?? ...

Pejo I drink water, comes from the mountains, these mountains (Great Zebrù and Ortles)


And between the mountains and the source there are no human settlements I have seen with my own eyes, I was there, the only things that can dirty it is the hunting of marmots and eagles. The Levissima comes from those mountains, but I do not drink even the Levissima, because I saw where it is: between the mountains and the source there is a whole country, even a city: Bormio, with thousands of people and many human activities.

And the mud if those who drink it? Anyone who thinks that just make a law to become a good bad thing!

They are good if they correspond to the values \u200b\u200bof column B of Table dm 471/99? You are good to achieve industrial zones, but not for residential areas because these values \u200b\u200bare 10 to 100 times greater than those of column A, but if the legislature is concerned to determine a column A, means that fully recognizes that values higher than those in this column are harmful to human health.

And you drink water?

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Inserting Tampons Adult

Once upon a time

Once upon a time "a turning point"

had called "a turning point," an agreement, the sludge of Bagnoli, which would depend the future of this city.

It took two months of detailed and reasoned opposition to the Committee NOfanghi supported by thousands of citizens to bring out a disturbing truth: that agreement has no legal consistency (no certificates, permits and environmental impact assessments) will financial (there are the much-vaunted 274 million euro) and there are no particular environmental safeguards (remember the re-launch of the TAP for treatments and new investment in clean technologies? Do not talk about it anymore). Of that agreement in high-quality paper distributed to 18,000 households in color, standing there was practically nothing.

Now there is talk of a "new draft agreement," the development of new "guarantees" and search for funds that are currently not found.

At this point, again with more strength and determination, we ask again: "Why would you want at all costs lead to Piombino reclaiming Bagnoli? And then ask how many people with common sense "because if it is not all good stuff if they keep them?"

We reiterate: Nobody creates false illusions: NOT A KILO OF SLUDGE MUST BAGNOLI to Piombino. Bagnoli has the right to be reclaimed, but it has as much right Piombino that every year produces a million tons of industrial waste and that it has stored tens of millions in its industrial area.

It 's time the city council declaring the eligibility of the Referendum, ANY OF THE REASONS FOR AND' STATE REQUIRED AND 'FAILED.

would eventually correct the baby and democratic Democratic Party (determining force in most of the city government) did to their constituents to know, first of the "primary" thing intends to do on the Referendum. It would be unfortunate if the first act of a political party that bears the name "Democrats" was the denial of the right of citizens to have their say on the environment, health and future of the city. Reads a slogan on a beautiful posters these days "are a democratically, 'I decide' hope rests not just a campaign slogan.

REFERENDUM!

Saturday, October 6, 2007

Examples Of Welcome Speech

TG3