Tirreno From this morning (yesterday) - "Here's the new agreement: development of the port and land reclamation for the city of Piombino is the title of the meeting with the commissioner Bramerini scheduled for tonight at 21 at the Hall of Perticale - .
I went there, and the
I do not drink the tap water, some are controlled every day, is certainly consistent with the values \u200b\u200bof law ... Law? What law?? and if the law changes, the first one that was bad becomes good? and why it's called "water of the mayor? ... Want to see that the law makes it. ... Who?? ...
Pejo I drink water, comes from the mountains, these mountains (Great Zebrù and Ortles)
And between the mountains and the source there are no human settlements I have seen with my own eyes, I was there, the only things that can dirty it is the hunting of marmots and eagles. The Levissima comes from those mountains, but I do not drink even the Levissima, because I saw where it is: between the mountains and the source there is a whole country, even a city: Bormio, with thousands of people and many human activities.
And the mud if those who drink it? Anyone who thinks that just make a law to become a good bad thing!
They are good if they correspond to the values \u200b\u200bof column B of Table dm 471/99? You are good to achieve industrial zones, but not for residential areas because these values \u200b\u200bare
And you drink water?
Once upon a time "a turning point"
had called "a turning point," an agreement, the sludge of Bagnoli, which would depend the future of this city.
It took two months of detailed and reasoned opposition to the Committee NOfanghi supported by thousands of citizens to bring out a disturbing truth: that agreement has no legal consistency (no certificates, permits and environmental impact assessments) will financial (there are the much-vaunted 274 million euro) and there are no particular environmental safeguards (remember the re-launch of the TAP for treatments and new investment in clean technologies? Do not talk about it anymore). Of that agreement in high-quality paper distributed to 18,000 households in color, standing there was practically nothing.
Now there is talk of a "new draft agreement," the development of new "guarantees" and search for funds that are currently not found.
At this point, again with more strength and determination, we ask again: "Why would you want at all costs lead to Piombino reclaiming Bagnoli? And then ask how many people with common sense "because if it is not all good stuff if they keep them?"
We reiterate: Nobody creates false illusions: NOT A KILO OF SLUDGE MUST BAGNOLI to Piombino. Bagnoli has the right to be reclaimed, but it has as much right Piombino that every year produces a million tons of industrial waste and that it has stored tens of millions in its industrial area.
It 's time the city council declaring the eligibility of the Referendum, ANY OF THE REASONS FOR AND' STATE REQUIRED AND 'FAILED.
would eventually correct the baby and democratic Democratic Party (determining force in most of the city government) did to their constituents to know, first of the "primary" thing intends to do on the Referendum. It would be unfortunate if the first act of a political party that bears the name "Democrats" was the denial of the right of citizens to have their say on the environment, health and future of the city. Reads a slogan on a beautiful posters these days "are a democratically, 'I decide' hope rests not just a campaign slogan.
REFERENDUM!