Replica Committee No Sludge interview the Mayor
The city wants the referendum. ... And the truth
If there is a new agreement on Bagnoli make it public, otherwise you do not make unnecessary claims. The interview given by the mayor to Anselmi Corriere Etrusco "made clear that without the much-vaunted" new deal "exists only in its intentions in the ads. One thing is certain: the old design, the one that currently exists, does not go over well either of them. Mayor and majority, who have staunchly defended him for months and heralded as a momentous occasion for the city of Piombino, now to say that that agreement Tugging no longer exists and that it will change radically.
But without popular mobilization, Anselmi had signed back in July a hoax of historic proportions: arrival of hazardous waste, lack of resources to cover operating costs, no relation to the reclamation of the SIN of Piombino a door made of waste tanks and docks, no serious consultation. And now you want even accredited as having averted the danger, improving the agreement that he stood until a few days ago. The Mayor admits that "it was urged by Rome and not requested by us, so if the government falls or" if one day get a statement from Rome says that the transaction will not be done more ... "It even seems to hope that an external circumstance or accidental levi's chestnuts from the fire.
would be better that our directors will assume their responsibilities and admit publicly that he did flop. Instead they seem to offer the city a new bluff. Or have to defend it wrong before and wrong now to change it. That's not how it strengthens the credibility of the institutions. You can not govern by trial or going blind, and especially can not tell lies. The same interview contains different: you want some documented example regarding the merits of the project?
1) the mayor said that before the materials were to be treated not to go in the tank but for the road foundations: false, because the point b art. 7 of the program expects to receive 600,000 cubic meters for the tanks., Of which 400,000 and 200,000 eligible to waste directly after treatment. Program is written in the Agreement on 31 July.
2) states that the mayor Nerli, president of the PA in Naples, had stated that the transfer in an anticipation of Piombino tanks consistently time the dismantling of Colma. False too, here's the official statement made to the Committee Nerli Surveillance few days ago: "if the agreement is signed by October, you save five months ..." 44 million more for public money in less than five months (reported by "The Chronicles of Naples on 19 October 2007). But the agreement not be signed by October, then the gap will shrink again.
also regret to note that the mayor continues to insult the committee (and especially the thousands of citizens who have followed him) reduces civic engagement in "political operation", which indicates once again lack of democratic character and plot suffer from the syndrome . The committee is not a small group of people, but a popular movement that has lasted three months, how long you could not see in this city. On behalf of the many active citizens concerned about the environmental situation of Piombino, we consider a priority and no more ads sull'inesistente referendum, and if there is ever a new agreement, it must be made known to the council and the citizens so that begins a new and true path of democratic participation. Finally
three other things, always on the merits.
The mayor, who has always shown a safe filled with the composition of Bagnoli, admits so perplexing that I know nothing about the content of the landfill Lucchini Piombino, in his hometown.
says that it all boils down to "dock", but this should do not worry just the same Port Authority, as an effluent as it is filled with sediment and Bagnoli pose serious risks for the chance to convert the tanks into the docks, is for different qualities (should not be polluted) and static. E 'already happened in Livorno that after filling the tanks with waste, they were not eligible to use port .
finally informs us that the road will be 398 with CIC produced by TAP, which if all goes well will start work in 2009. Not to mention that the design of the 398 there is still (and this too is expected to be ten years!) And is the essential condition for funding: But how long in this way to implement the project? Even the 398 seems to recede to the port. Would not it be better to work hard at his plan and reclamation, rather than smashing affair behind the incomprehensible Bagnoli?
The Committee No Mud
0 comments:
Post a Comment